Book

men in black: how the sup
Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America
storm center: the supreme
Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics, Seventh Edition
the american supreme cour
The American Supreme Court, Fourth Edition (The Chicago History of American Civilization)

Music

We'll F*** You Up!
Live in Session
yell it out
Yell It Out

Apparel

supreme court sweatshirt
Supreme Court Sweatshirt
supreme court t-shirt
Supreme Court T-shirt
euro socks kids court jr.
Euro Socks Kids Court Jr. Supreme Med. Wt. Ped Sock

Kitchen

supreme court keychain
Supreme Court Keychain
supreme court mug
Supreme Court Mug

Images

Tags


©2005 Celebsoup

Supreme Court News

Panel argues in favor of 
A panel of advocates for same-sex marriage 
spoke Thursday evening, a day after 
  Daily Princetonian 
Web site is mostly blank 
A day after publishing negative comments 
about Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., for 
  Bismarck Tribune 
Sick-leave swap dies 
Utah's public employees will no longer 
be able to swap out saved sick leave 
  Deseret Morning News 
SC issues notices to Centre, 
The Supreme Court today issued notices 
to the Centre and Assam Government 
  Deccan Herald 
Living a Christ-like life 
On Wednesday this week, a Judiciary 
Committee turned up the heat on Supreme 
  Selma Times-Journal 
Don't tell us 'you can't' 
The state Supreme Court Wednesday heard 
arguments on whether gays should be 
  NorthJersey.com 
Abdur’Rahman challenges 
Tennessee’s lethal injection protocol 
could come before the U.S. Supreme 
  Nashville City Paper 
Daya Nayak was into cricket 
The police have for the first time 
disclosed that suspended cop Daya Nayak 
  Mid Day 
SC notice to Centre, Assam 
The Supreme Court on Friday issued 
notices to the Centre and Assam Government 
  Sify News 
State supreme court upholds 
JACKSON — The Mississippi Supreme 
Court has upheld the conviction and 
  The Natchez Democrat 
Natalee's Family Sues Van 
Catching Paulus and Joran Van Der Sloot 
in New York for a media interview, 
  About.com 
Editorial: We all lose in 
WITH the Supreme Court having given 
a "go" to the country's mining law, 
  Sun Star 

Blog Mentions of Supreme Court

Court’s time bomb: Blowing 
Court’s time bomb: Blowing up the NH 
Advantage September 10th, 2006    There 
  NHcafe 
To the Chief Justice of the 
We must question the current Chief 
Justice’s call for respect to the judiciary 
  Bahas 

Supreme Court Audio

"Supreme Court Goes Electric - King Fried Jackass"03:46   MP3 128k
"Supreme Court Goes Electric - King Fried Jackass"03:46   MP3 128k
"W A St Supreme Court Oral Arguments"42:00   REAL 28k
"W A St Supreme Court Oral Arguments"41:15   REAL 28k
"Supreme Court 2001 - Opinion"00:59   MP3 256k
"Supreme Court 1996 - Washington V. Glucksberg Argument (96-110)"1:00:21   MP3 256k
"Supreme Court 1990 - 88-2043"59:07   MP3 128k
"Supreme Court 2004 - Granholm V. Heald"39:35   MP3 256k
"Supreme Court 2004 - MGM Studios V. Grokster"39:06   MP3 256k
"Supreme Court 2002 - Borden Ranch V. United States Army Corps Of Engineers Opinion"00:12   MP3 256k

Related Searches

Pictures

Related Links

Videos

Supreme Court

The '''supreme court''' in some countries, provinces, and states, functions as a '''court of last resort''' whose rulings cannot be challenged. In the United States, for example, there is a federal Supreme Court as well as supreme courts within most of the states. However, some jurisdictions do not use the phrase "Supreme Court" in naming their highest courts, and some jurisdictions use this phrase to name courts which are not their highest courts, as described below. Although some countries and subordinate states follow the American model of having a supreme court that interprets that jurisdiction's constitution, others follow the Austrian model of a separate constitutional court (first developed in the Austrian Constitution of 1920).

Furthermore, in some countries, such as Finland, there is no constitutional court; the constitutionality of a law is implicit and cannot be challenged. Furthermore, in e.g. Finland and Poland, there is a separate Supreme Administrative Court whose decisions are final and whose jurisdiction does not overlap with the Supreme Court.

Many higher courts create through their decisions case law applicable within their respective jurisdictions or interpret codal provisions in civil-law countries to maintain a uniform interpretation:

* Most common law nations have the doctrine of ''stare decisis'' in which the rulings (decisions) of higher courts constitute binding precedent upon courts of equal or lower status within their jurisdiction.
* Most civil law (legal system) nations do not have the official doctrine of ''stare decisis'' and hence the rulings of the supreme court are usually not binding outside the immediate case in question. However, in practice, the precedent, or ''jurisprudence'', expressed by those courts is often extremely strong. Some exceptions such as Spain are discussed below.

Common law jurisdictions


Australia


The High Court of Australia became the court of last resort with the passing of the Australia Act in 1986. This act abolished the last rights of appeal to the Privy Council.

Each state and territory has its own Supreme Court, which leads to some confusion among those from other jurisdictions as the term "supreme court" seems to refer to the court of last resort. The reason that the High Court of Australia is not named the 'supreme court' is purely historical. Before the federation of the Australian colonies as states of Australia (in 1901), each colony had its own independent judicial system with a supreme court as the highest court physically within the colony (with a right of appeal to the Privy Council). On federation, the constitution provided for the establishment of the 'High Court' which could hear appeals from the state Supreme Courts.

Canada


The Supreme Court of Canada was established in 1875
Article licensed under GNU Free Documentation License. See the Wikipedia article "Supreme_Court"